Imperial Star Destroyer V2 – Work in Progress
Re: Imperial Star Destroyer V2 – Work in Progress
- rogue518
- Posts: 2864
- Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2000 11:01 pm
- Contact:
Looking.... AWESOME!!!!
Sincerely, Rogue518
Sincerely, Rogue518
'Stay in Attack formation!' Darth Vader aka: Anakin Skywalker During the 'Battle Of Yavin'
- Will T
- Posts: 1371
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:01 pm
So this looks absolutely amazing, and I love the level of detail on it.
But is it too late in the opting process to ask for a change to the model? Those baffles in the main engines shouldn't be there if this is the ISDII.
The baffles are present on the ISD-I, as seen on the model for ANH's Devastator, but they aren't present in ESB's Avenger model.
It's one of the key differences between the ISD-I and II, along with the comms array on the bridge tower, the number of barrels on the main guns flanking the terrace and the vanes on the shield generators/sensor globes.
It's not a dealbreaker by any means, but the rest of the details look so good. It would be a shame to not take the chance to make the model as accurate as possible.
If it's too late and would mean restarting all the opting again, I'll completely understand.
But is it too late in the opting process to ask for a change to the model? Those baffles in the main engines shouldn't be there if this is the ISDII.
The baffles are present on the ISD-I, as seen on the model for ANH's Devastator, but they aren't present in ESB's Avenger model.
It's one of the key differences between the ISD-I and II, along with the comms array on the bridge tower, the number of barrels on the main guns flanking the terrace and the vanes on the shield generators/sensor globes.
It's not a dealbreaker by any means, but the rest of the details look so good. It would be a shame to not take the chance to make the model as accurate as possible.
If it's too late and would mean restarting all the opting again, I'll completely understand.
Formerly known as The 95 Headhunter
- ual002
- Posts: 983
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 2:23 am
I had never noticed this before. Here, take my Imperial ID card.
-
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:06 pm
Very good work, Ace.Ace Antilles wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2020 10:39 pmA few updated WIP pictures courtesy of Driftwood.
1.png2.png3.png
After you're done with Type 2, will you update Type 1? Will it get the Axial Towers on the crest or is this engine not feasible (in Rouge One you can see the great ones)
- Vince T
- Posts: 14052
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 11:01 pm
- Contact:
There has been some tweaking ... have you felt it?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Your ship, Captain. I need a drink. - Vince Trageton
Vince T's X-Wing HQ - where the bad guys get their gear
Vince T's X-Wing HQ - where the bad guys get their gear
- capitanguinea
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 3:59 pm
Sorry but i do not understand... isd batteries are all over the upper surface... and the heavies are nested in the 10 barbettes clustered around the back quarters. The front cone has mainly sensors and warheads tubes. It seems in the image that al laser firepower comes from that posirion instead o.o tipically isd firepower has ever been described as sheet over sheet of destructive energy, clicks wide and of an height of hundreds of meters (to compensate clasdical imperal unabilitý to aim, I suppose )
- Vince T
- Posts: 14052
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 11:01 pm
- Contact:
You'll have to take that up with lucasArts. They programmed the game so only the laser hardpoints closest to the target would fire. How many of those is determined by the weapon setup. In case of the ISD2, the maximum number of simultatneous shots is 10.
Your ship, Captain. I need a drink. - Vince Trageton
Vince T's X-Wing HQ - where the bad guys get their gear
Vince T's X-Wing HQ - where the bad guys get their gear
- capitanguinea
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 3:59 pm
I stand corrected, then. It is still a gorgeous model
- the_stag
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 3:47 pm
I wonder if that could be changed with a hook...General_Trageton wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:44 amYou'll have to take that up with lucasArts. They programmed the game so only the laser hardpoints closest to the target would fire.
- JeremyaFr
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 5:52 pm
- Contact:
It seems that the function that select the laser hardpoint is situated at address 00487FD0.
- the_stag
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 3:47 pm
This guy... that's amazing. Now it just needs to be modified so that only certain turrets attack depending on ship type. Although there's a possibility that could disrupt balance. This is all way over my head.
- Trevor
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:11 pm
I was just about to say, people have already complained about balance, and if you change the way lasers fire there will be more - However, I would be interested in such a patch to go along with the 256 weapon patch (since I like the effect - makes the battles much more lively) and having ISDs fire "correctly" would just look awesomeAlthough there's a possibility that could disrupt balance.
Trev
- Forceflow
- Posts: 7212
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 1999 11:01 pm
- Contact:
I agree that this would be awesome, but that would require a massive overhaul of pretty much all missions that include any kind of warship in an active role. I would also love to actually get the game to not shoot at the center of the ship but to actually shoot at the closest part of the ship. Currently the SSD just pretty much cannot really be killed because it's so massive that any other ships has to fly over it for several klicks until it can even start shooting. (At which point it will have been destroyed anyways)Trevor wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2020 10:31 amI was just about to say, people have already complained about balance, and if you change the way lasers fire there will be more - However, I would be interested in such a patch to go along with the 256 weapon patch (since I like the effect - makes the battles much more lively) and having ISDs fire "correctly" would just look awesomeAlthough there's a possibility that could disrupt balance.
Trev
Bit it would be cool to see if this can be adjusted at all, it would certainly open up a whole lot of new possibilities.
Murphy was an optimist! I am a pessimist!
And always remember that a smile is cheaper than a bullet! (District 9)
Webmaster of the X-Wing Alliance Upgrade Project
And always remember that a smile is cheaper than a bullet! (District 9)
Webmaster of the X-Wing Alliance Upgrade Project
- Trevor
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:11 pm
I would also love to actually get the game to not shoot at the center of the ship but to actually shoot at the closest part of the ship.
Oh now I can imagine full broadsides al-la Ep3 going on where at first the noses start firing then as each ship passes more and more guns fire at each other targeting the closest "bounds" to them (rather than center)
but yeah, total overhaul of missions for that config.
I still want to know if that 6,000 craft video was real or somehow made up. if it were real imagine the possibilities (not actually using that number, but certainly having more than 29 craft in a region would be nice filler) and knowing laser counts are not limiting gameplay hahaha
Trev
-
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 11:01 pm
I thought AlliED editor allows targeting components aka mesh types of a targeted ship when using attack orders but maybe that only applies to AI starfighters. If so, has anyone tested with nonflyable craft? Maybe I'm imagining that.
W-I-P: TFTC, MC Viscount Cr., ISD-II Avenger, NL-1 Platform, Ton-Falk Esc. Cr., & Misc.
- Trevor
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:11 pm
Bman, that would be scripted though, not AI.
The idea is that AI "deciding" to attack a craft will target its center AND perform calculations based on the center rather than the closest bounds.
Center certainly is easier and bounds requires more complexity - eg, if you target a corner of a bounds of an ISD you would miss because of the ISD's wedge shape.
But, despite that, it would be cool to have implemented and raising the componants gives me an idea to help simplify the issue, target the nearest component center.
Trev
The idea is that AI "deciding" to attack a craft will target its center AND perform calculations based on the center rather than the closest bounds.
Center certainly is easier and bounds requires more complexity - eg, if you target a corner of a bounds of an ISD you would miss because of the ISD's wedge shape.
But, despite that, it would be cool to have implemented and raising the componants gives me an idea to help simplify the issue, target the nearest component center.
Trev
- Ace Antilles
- Posts: 7901
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2000 12:01 am
- Contact:
Can you feel the rumbling? Of course not you are in space
Click here for a giant super size version, courtesy of General Trageton
https://i.imgur.com/H9rBkwN.jpg
Click here for a giant super size version, courtesy of General Trageton
https://i.imgur.com/H9rBkwN.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Vince T
- Posts: 14052
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2001 11:01 pm
- Contact:
Yup, knew it! The world is an ungrateful place. I utterly tore out my soul to improve on that bloody SWG model and people start complaining about textures not being 8k FFS! Thanks for ruining my evening!
And themini ISDs on the debris result from the original using generic metal-like textures that had little to no visible details whatsoever.
And themini ISDs on the debris result from the original using generic metal-like textures that had little to no visible details whatsoever.
Your ship, Captain. I need a drink. - Vince Trageton
Vince T's X-Wing HQ - where the bad guys get their gear
Vince T's X-Wing HQ - where the bad guys get their gear
- Driftwood
- Posts: 2174
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2003 11:01 pm
- Contact:
UV mapping is more efficient use of texture memory and organizational resources. Obviously that didn't really exist in 99. The larger the texture resolution combined with number of textures slows stuff down. And easier to work with.
Thbbbt.
Thbbbt.
- Trevor
- Posts: 541
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 7:11 pm
You realise that "UV mapping" happens with any model that has textures?
I Think what you meant was "Texture atlas".
Though, and this is my point, a texture atlas is best used in...
So, Large textures don't need to be on an atlas if they are themselves capable of using most of the texture space themselves - eg, a repeating/mirrored/clamped texture.In an application where many small textures are used frequently, it is often more efficient to store the textures in a texture atlas which is treated as a single unit by the graphics hardware. This reduces the overhead of a context switch by increasing memory locality. Careful alignment may be needed to avoid bleeding between sub textures when used with mipmapping and texture compression.
Anyway, I'll not derail the topic farther with texture theory, every modeler has their own method.
Trev
- darklord
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:01 am
- Contact:
Trev, I think you are overestimating what the XWA engine can do. Just look at the rest of the project. GT's SD is among the best there is, but he still has to work within XWA's limitations, even if things are a little better with the new hooks. Everyone's pushing the game to the limit, but it's over 20 years old cut people some slack...
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2020 10:31 am
I’m a new member here but a long time visitor to XWAUP. Just wanted to say General Trageton, you’ve done an amazing job on this Star Destroyer, best model released in my opinion so far!
Do you have plans to use this Imperial Class-II as a template for the Class-I? I look forward to viewing and testing your upcoming releases. Keep up the great work!
Do you have plans to use this Imperial Class-II as a template for the Class-I? I look forward to viewing and testing your upcoming releases. Keep up the great work!